THE SAN FRANCISCO SOUND (excerpts)
The Fillmore Auditorium, the gravitational center of the
astonishing new San Francisco
rock scene, at midnight on a Saturday night:
An enormous red globe of light gurgles liquidly on one
thirty-five-foot-high wall, glowing like a hydrogen fireball. On another wall,
infinitely complex green light globules flow into each other and pulsate
explosively. On a third wall, moire patterns, giant eyeballs, de Kooning-like
abstracts flash past in swift alternation next to an endlessly repeating film
of one small boy after another eating jelly bread.
On the floor, two thousand people are watching, listening,
and moving. None of them appear to be older than thirty. Many are “straight,”
like the crew-cut blond boy in chinos and poplin jacket, whose brunette date
wears a plaid skirt and knee socks. But most are “hippies,” part of the growing
society within a society that centers around Berkeley
and the Haight-Ashbury section of San
Francisco, and, though their tastes obviously tend
toward the informal, the bizarre, and the flamboyant, none of them look alike.
There are wide mod ties, wispy string ties, and one fellow with a solid
aluminum tie. There are boys in silk frock coats, top hats, suede boots, red
sweatshirts emblazoned with the zouave who decorates packages of Zig-Zag
cigarette paper. There are girls in miniskirts and net stockings, capes and
candy-striped pants, paisley socks and bare feet. A few people have adorned
their faces with curlicues of phosphorescent paint. The beards range from the
trimmed and Schweppesian to the full and piratical to the shaggy and
rabbinical. The hair ranges from the merely long to the shoulder-length and
beyond. Some people are sitting or standing, but most are dancing. They are not
doing the frug, the monkey, or any other particular dance. They are just
dancing – any way they like. And from the platform at the far end of the
auditorium, electronically escalated through a two-hundred-watt amplification
system, filling every corner and brain in the room, comes the San Francisco sound, played on this
particular Saturday night by one of its principal purveyors, the Grateful Dead.
The Fillmore is the most important part of the San Francisco rock scene,
but it is merely the tip of the iceberg. According to one estimate, there are
some two hundred and fifty rock and roll bands in the San Francisco Bay
area, and of these, in the judgment of at least one record company executive,
perhaps forty are of professional quality. Rock and roll is growing all over
the country, but here, where the growth is greater than anywhere else, there
are differences.
For one thing, as the jazz critic Ralph J. Gleason puts it,
“San Francisco
bands are oriented toward playing for people. In Los Angeles, the pattern is for a group to
practice and practice in a garage until it’s good enough to record.” There are
plenty of places for bands to play for people. Rivaling (though never
surpassing) the Fillmore in decibels, imaginative light shows, and general
atmosphere is the somewhat smaller Avalon Ballroom, where a group of hippies
who call themselves the Family Dog produce weekend dance concerts. Besides the
Avalon and the Fillmore, big rock dances are held at California Hall and
Longshoremen’s Hall in San Francisco,
in college gyms, and in big rooms around the Bay Area – places like the San
Leandro Rollerena and the San Bruno Armory. Then there are the pure rock clubs
– the Matrix in San Francisco, the Jabberwock in
Berkeley, the
Arc in Sausalito – where people listen to rock and roll as if it were jazz,
except that the music is too loud for casual chitchat. Finally, there are the endless
go-go and dance clubs, at least one in every little suburban town and all of
them hiring live rock music.
The scope of the rock scene in San Francisco sets it apart from other
cities. But there are more important differences.
Rock and roll is a field which is subject to an enormous
amount of manipulation. A few men – record company executives, radio station
programmers, tour promoters, key disc jockeys – exert terrific power. And even
when there is no hanky-panky, it is a chancy business. A radio program director
who must choose one or two singles out of the two hundred or so sent him every
week is bound to make arbitrary or whimsical choices sometimes. The
record-buying public, like the television-watching public, by design or not, is
frequently gulled into liking the worst kind of trash.
But in San
Francisco, no one is pulling the strings. There are no
shadowy fingers lurking in the background in sharkskin suits and smoked
glasses. The discriminating, attentive audiences who attend the big rock-dance
concerts have not been told to like the San
Francisco sound, but they like it anyway. As a result,
groups like the Jefferson Airplane and the Grateful Dead, neither of which has
ever had a hit record, are able to earn upward of two thousand dollars for a
weekend’s work.
Bill Graham, creator and manager of the Fillmore Auditorium,
learned the hard way that San
Francisco audiences can’t be fooled. In a moment of
weakness last August, Graham booked a hokey group called Sam the Sham and the
Pharaohs, whose record, “Little Red Riding Hood,” was a big national hit at the
time. “Only three hundred and eighty-seven people came, and I lost eighteen
hundred dollars,” recalled Graham. “The people – my people – stayed away. It
was the best thing that ever happened to me.”
The music appeals to a broad range of people, but it is a
definite part of the “hippie scene,” San
Francisco’s new bohemianism. Unlike the sullen Beats
of the fifties, who sat around in coffee houses complaining about how rotten
and meaningless everything was, the hippies, much more numerous than the Beats
ever were, accentuate the positive. They dress wildly, individualistically,
colorfully – “ecstatically,” they would say. Like the Beats, they are dropouts
from the conventional “status games,” but, unlike them, they have created their
own happy lifestyles to drop into. “In a way,” says Jerry Garcia, twenty-four,
lead guitarist of the Grateful Dead and one of the culture heroes of Haight-Ashbury, “we’re searching for respectability – not
Ford or GM respectability, but the respectability of a community supporting
itself financially and spiritually.”
Not many hippies have ever heard of Marshall McLuhan, and
fewer have read him, but McLuhan’s analysis is useful in understanding them.
The old “Gutenberg-era” values of privacy, prestige through money and job, and
linear, cause-and-effect logical thinking are out the window. The hippies have
embraced the new, “electric” tribal values of total involvement. They are for
freedom and “honesty,” against categorization, even, in a sense, against
language itself. “Maybe the tyranny of the written word is something that is
going out,” muses Jerry Garcia. “Language is almost designed to be
misunderstood.”
Psychedelic drugs such as marijuana and LSD are very important
to the hippies. Through these drugs the hippie achieves the total involvement,
sensory and emotional, that he seeks. On marijuana, he sees, hears, and feels
colors and sounds more vividly. On LSD, his ego dissolves and is replaced by an
abiding love and appreciation for all people and things. He becomes more
existential than the existentialists, because his total immersion in the
present is untainted by any sense of the absurdity of the future.
In the light of the hippies’ approach to life and sensibility,
it is easy to understand why the most creative of them have turned to art forms
that offer immediate sensory involvement: experimental films, colorful poster
art, abstract light shows, and rock and roll. Unsurprisingly, the hippies have
produced little in the way of good writing.
There is no such thing as a hippie who favors the war in Vietnam, but
few hippies are political activists. They tend to think in moral and personal,
not political, terms. When their lapel buttons are remotely political, they tend
to relate political issues to personal ones, as in the slogans “Make Love Not
War,” and “Keep California Green – Legalize Grass.” More often, though, their
buttons say things like “Nirvana Now,” or simply, “Love.”
This is not to say, though, that hippies are uninterested in
social change. They take the long view. Their approach is to create their own
society of love and light and then wait for everybody else to join up.
Anger is uncommon among hippies. Last month, when California’s new law outlawing the possession of LSD went
into effect, a group of Haight-Ashbury heads
decided to stage a protest. But then they decided that a protest would be “too
negative,” so they staged a celebration instead. It turned out to be a pleasant
afternoon in the Panhandle of Golden Gate Park, with rock bands playing,
children finger-painting on the ground, and people wandering among the trees
with cans of beer. “Our attitude is strictly laissez-faire,” says Jerry Garcia.
“Nobody throws rocks at the cops anymore, because we’re all human beings in
this together.”
The hippies don’t even hate the undercover narcotics agents,
whom they call “narcos” or “brain police.” A few weeks ago, one such agent,
whose picture had appeared in the paper when he received a departmental honor,
walked into the Fillmore in his customary hippie disguise. He was applauded.
The benevolent tolerance of the hippie world is obvious to
anyone who has ever visited the Fillmore Auditorium on a Friday or Saturday
night. Those who go in suits and ties, as many parents, journalists, curious
citizens, and record company representatives have done, find absolutely no
hostility whatsoever. No one jostles them and hisses, “Get out of our place,
you square,” or some such. No one is made to feel that he is intruding. “We
don’t want you to freak out,” Bill Graham says. “We want you to melt. A lot of
people come in here like blocks of ice against the nasty beatniks. We want you
to break down so your pores are open, so you’ll look, you’ll listen, you’ll
enjoy.”
The breaking down begins as soon as you pay your admission
price ($2.50 to $3.50, depending on the talent), walk up the wide, rather dingy
staircase, and enter the lobby. The first things you see are a couple of big
boxes with a hand-lettered sign on them: HAVE ONE…OR TWO. The boxes are filled
with apples and lollipops. Graham gives away 2,376 apples and 2,160 lollipops
every weekend. “If a guy walks in here worried about what kind of nutty scene
he’s getting himself into and the first thing that happens to him is somebody
gives him an apple,” says Graham, “he’s bound to loosen up a little.” The
lobby’s walls are covered with signs (ONCE INSIDE, NO OUTSY-INSY), posters, and
clippings about Lenny Bruce, Jasper Johns, and Pat Boone.
What the Fillmore does is to have so much going on that the
visitor can vary the intensity and quality of his pleasure. It is next to
impossible to be bored there. If the visitor gets fidgety listening to the
music, he can dance. If he gets tired, he can watch the ever-changing, mesmerizing
light show. Or he can look at the fantastic variety of people doing their
fantastic free-form dances. Or he can retire to the relative quiet of the lobby
for an apple and some browsing among the things posted on the wall. Or he can
go upstairs for a hamburger and survey the scene from the balcony. If he feels
like a nap, he can find a quiet patch of floor off in a corner somewhere and go
to sleep. No one will mind.
[omitted paragraphs on Bill Graham's biography]
…In February of 1964, Graham [went] to work as business
manager and producer of the San Francisco Mime Troupe, a New Left theatre group
which was (and is) raising the ire of the city fathers by performing bawdy
commedia dell’arte in the public parks and producing an anti-everybody updated
minstrel show called “Civil Rights in a Cracker Barrel.” The rock dance scene
was three weeks old when Graham got into it. The first dance, sponsored by the
Family Dog and entitled “A Tribute to Dr. Strange,” had been held on October
16, 1965, at Longshoreman’s Hall near Fisherman’s Wharf. On November 6, Graham
threw a rock benefit at the Mime Troupe’s Howard Street headquarters. Some three
thousand people showed up to pack the room, whose official capacity was six
hundred, and Graham had to soften up a police sergeant by blandly calling him
“lieutenant” to keep him from closing the whole thing down.
Clearly a larger place was needed. Graham nosed around and
found the Fillmore Auditorium, a run-down old ballroom at Fillmore Street and Geary Boulevard in the city’s biggest
Negro ghetto. He rented it for sixty dollars, and on December 10 threw another
wildly successful rock and roll benefit. Shortly thereafter, Graham and the
Mime Troupe parted company, and Graham decided to go it alone. He went back to
the Fillmore and found that eleven other promoters had already put in bids for
it. Graham got forty-one prominent citizens to write letters to the
auditorium’s owner, a haberdasher named Harry Shifs, and Shifs gave him a
three-year lease at five hundred dollars a month. Graham isn’t a zillionare
yet, but he’s making a comfortable living (he’ll probably take home well over
fifty thousand dollars this year), and he is beginning to be regarded as a San Francisco institution, like the cable cars, Chinatown, and the topless. “The hippie community,” says
Jerry Garcia, “has turned out to be something the man from Montgomery Street can point to with
pride, in a left-handed way, and say ‘these are our boys.’”
It was not always so. Back in April, official San Francisco seemed determined
to put Graham and the Fillmore out of business. First the police department
turned down Graham’s application for a dance permit. The rock impresario took
his case to the City Board of Permit Appeals. The police responded by producing
a petition of complaint from twenty-eight local merchants.
Graham went through the ceiling. He charged that the police
had collected the signatures by accusing Graham of being a “pusher” whose
extravagance attracted “the bad element.” He went around to the merchants himself
and got retractions from twenty-three of the twenty-eight, plus a statement of
support from Rabbi Elliot Bernstein of the neighboring Congregation Beth
Israel, who had earlier been heard to complain that hippies were urinating on
his synagogue.
The appeals board turned Graham down anyway. At this point,
when all seemed lost, the San Francisco Chronicle came to the rescue on April 21
with an editorial, “The Fillmore Auditorium Case,” and a cartoon of a
blubbering police officer captioned, “They’re dancing with tears in my eyes.”
“The official hostility is not yet satisfactorily explained,” opined the Chron.
“The police say the dance halls attract disorderly crowds and generate fights –
but have reported none at the Fillmore Auditorium since Graham took over.”
The police were groggy but still on their feet. An officer
showed up in Graham’s office, waved the paper at him, and told him the
editorial was a “personal affront.” The next evening, the police invaded the
Fillmore and arrested Graham and fourteen under-eighteen patrons. The charge
was violation of a city ordinance prohibiting minors from going unchaperoned to
dance halls. The ordinance, passed in 1909 and unenforced for half a century,
had been designed for an earlier, wilder San Francisco,
when young girls ventured into the Barbary Coast
at their peril.
The Chronicle struck back with another editorial, “Certain
Questions About a Police Raid,” which asked, among other things, “Was the
Friday night raid vindictive or punitive or the result of police prejudice
against the neighborhood? We hope not.” Three weeks later, the City Board of
Permit Appeals gave Graham his permit.
Since then, police interest in harassing the Fillmore has
dropped to zero. Order is kept by seven private policemen, six male and one
female, whom Graham calls “swinging cops who know what’s happening.” One of the
joys of the Fillmore is to watch one of these policemen standing quietly in a
corner, rocking back and forth to the music, or joking with a long-haired,
bead-wearing hippie. But they do their job. “If one of my regulars comes around
obviously smashed on pot or booze,” says Graham, “the cop’ll say, ‘Not tonight,
man. Come back when you’re straighter.’ The kid’ll say, ‘Aw, come on,’ but
he’ll go.” Very few police are needed, because the hippies will tell them if
anyone is smoking pot, picking a fight, or otherwise misbehaving. “It’s not
‘cause they’re stoolies,” explains Graham. “It’s their scene, too. They know
that if we get busted, they lose their scene.”
That the Chronicle defended the Fillmore so resoundingly was
largely the doing of Ralph Gleason. Gleason and entertainment reporter John
Wasserman had for months been treating the Fillmore and the Avalon Ballroom as
places of serious artistic endeavor. “Some of the Chronicle’s editors who had
teenage kid had been to the Fillmore to see for themselves,” recalls Gleason.
“At the editorial meeting, the science editor and a sports columnist came along
to urge a strong stand. They knew it wasn’t just that nut Gleason, and this
made an impression.”
Bill Graham himself is a wiry man with light brown eyes, a
perpetual five o’clock shadow, and black hair combed in to a modified version
of old-style Presley rocker. He has a craggy face and a wide mouth that make
him look a little like the late Lenny Bruce. He spends most of the day at the
Fillmore in his tiny, cluttered office, which looks like the inside of a
chimney. He is a gesticulating, nonstop, New York-accented talker. Sometimes
his monologues take on the character of a rant. Sometimes he is unnecessarily
curt. (“In my conversation,” he says, “the ‘fuck you’ replaces the ‘please.’”)
Graham can – and frequently does – talk for hours about the
Fillmore and his role in it. His philosophy boils down to the following: “Art
in America
can only survive within the framework of a sound business structure.” He likes
making money, but he prefers the challenge of creating a good scene. “If I were
to say to you that I don’t give a damn about the dollar, I’d be lying,” he
says. “But the dollar is second to the result. I have my orgasm at one in the
morning when I go up to the balcony and see everyone having a good time.”
A lot of people dislike Graham for his toughness, but in his
management of the Fillmore he has shown taste, imagination, and courage. He
combined a dance-concert played by the Jefferson Airplane with a reading by
Andrei Voznesensky, the Soviet poet. When he booked the Byrds, the well-known Los Angeles folk-rock
group, he combined them with a production of LeRoi Jones’s play The Dutchman.
Lenny Bruce made one of his last public appearances at the Fillmore on June 24
and 25.
Graham has run benefits at the Fillmore for such causes as
SNCC (the Student Nonviolent Co-ordinating Committee), the Delano grape
strikers, the North Beach children’s nursery, the San Francisco Artist’s
Liberation Front, and the Both/And, an experimental jazz nightclub. There was even,
once, a wedding at the Fillmore. Between sets one Saturday night, a young man
named Lee “Thunder Machine” Quanstrum married his blonde fiancee “Space Daisy”
(many hippies affect comic-book-type nicknames), in a Unitarian (what else?)
ceremony conducted on the bandstand. Graham later got a thank-you note from the
couple. Here is its text: “Dear Bill, Thank you for making it possible for us
to be married in the style to which we are accustomed.”
On the weekend following last month’s racial disturbances in
San Francisco,
when virtually every establishment in the Fillmore District was padlocked after
dark, Graham brought off his dance-concerts on schedule. In doing so he went
against the advice of his attorneys and many friends (and lost a pile of
money), but he succeeded in proving that the Fillmore Auditorium could remain a
place of peace and light despite the tribulations of the world outside.
In addition to their social and artistic role in presenting
the new bohemianism and the new music of San
Francisco, the Fillmore Auditorium and the Avalon
Ballroom have pioneered an essentially new art form, the big light show. Light
displays in conjunction with rock music have been used before, and are being
used now in other cities (as at the Cheetah in New York). But these efforts have been
comparably primitive. The light shows that go with – and in a sense are part of
– the San Francisco
sound are unique in scope, brilliance, and technique.
The Fillmore’s light man, a twenty-nine-year-old painter
named Tony Martin, has led in working out the new methods, both at the Fillmore
and at the Tape Music Center of Mills College, Oakland, where his experiments
are financed under a two-hundred-thousand-dollar grant from the Rockefeller
Foundation. Martin uses a wide variety of equipment to produce his
extravaganzas: slide projectors and slides, both conventional (photographs of
things like trees and statues of Marc Antony) and handmade (patterns painted
directly onto the transparency); movies of every description, including the
endlessly repeating type, which are accomplished by running a circular strip of
film through a projector bicycle-chain style; colored, flashing footlights,
which project elongated, el Greco-like silhouettes of the musicians onto the
screen behind them; ordinary theatrical gels and spotlights; and all these in
combination.
The most impressive part of the light shows are the
bubbling, pulsating, exploding liquid projections, and the technology of these
is strikingly simple. The basic piece of equipment is an overhead projector,
the kind that college lecturers use to show maps and diagrams to their
students. Using a shallow glass dish (actually the crystal of a large clock),
the artist mixes vegetable color and water, oil, alcohol, and glycerin. The
possibilities are nearly infinite. By tilting the glass, the artist can make
the patterns ebb and flow. By raising and lowering the glass, he can squeeze
explosions of light in and out of existence. By putting his hand between the
light source and the mirrors which project to the screens, he can vary the
intensity of the light or block it off entirely. Even the artist’s cigarette smoke
adds a subtle touch.
The other main offshoot of the San Francisco sound has been the poster art
used to advertise the dance-concerts. The poster style, originated by Wes
Wilson, twenty-nine, who does the Fillmore’s posters, eschews conventional type
faces, no matter how unusual. Lettering, photographs, drawings, and abstract
design are woven into a continuous whole, with the words undulating around each
other or around photographs or drawings. In their ingenuity and use of
distorted lettering, the posters recall their French and German forebears of
the 1880s and 1890s. Wilson’s
posters are coveted by collectors, professional and amateur. The Oakland Art
Commission has a complete collection, which it plans to display in its new
museum. Graham gives away three thousand posters a week to his patrons at the
Fillmore, but even that fails to satisfy the demand. One day last summer Graham
put up a hundred and fifty posters along Berkeley’s
Telegraph Avenue
and then stopped at the Forum for a cup of coffee. By the time he got up to go
back to his car, only three of them were left.
None of these things, however – the lights, the
friendliness, the posters, the Avalon and Fillmore “scenes” – could exist
without the music.
The San Francisco
sound is played by a profusion of groups whose impressionistic, tongue-in-cheek
names reflect their determination to make a new kind of music. Generally
acknowledged as the best of the San
Francisco groups are the Jefferson Airplane and the
Grateful Dead. The other prominent bands include the Quicksilver Messenger
Service, the 13th Floor Elevator, the Sopwith Camel, Country Joe and
the Fish, Big Brother and the Holding Company, Moby Grape, the Loading Zone,
the Mystery Trend, the Wildflower, William Penn, the Harbinger Complex, Captain
Beefheart and His Magic Band, the Chocolate Watch Band, and the Sir Douglas
Quintet. There is even a group called the Five Year Plan, which played its most
recent (and perhaps only) gig at the annual picnic of the People’s World, the
West Coast Communist weekly.
The San Francisco
sound is a very hard-driving folk-rock with strong blues and electronic
influences. A San Francisco
band usually consists of three electric guitars (lead, rhythm, bass), drums,
and voices. Frequently another instrument (harmonic, electric organ, fiddle) is
added. An equally important part of the instrumentation is the electronic
amplifying equipment and its accoutrements – microphones, speakers, amplifiers,
pickups, tape loops, echo-makers, and reverberators. This equipment can create
an energy level that is astonishing. The Fillmore Auditorium’s sound system
develops enough power to run a small radio station and ten times as much as the
biggest home stereo equipment. The sound comes out at roughly a hundred
decibels and sometimes ventures as high as a hundred and ten, only ten decibels
under the pain level. In this situation the electronic equipment becomes part
of the machinery of music, not simply a way of making it audible to people in
the back of the room.
Elements of the music have been floating around for years.
It’s rock dance-music, so the beat is always firmly there: a very basic thump
thump thump underpinning the whole thing, a walloping electric bass and drum
booming away. The drummers play out of a straight rock and roll bag, except
that some of the best of them explode into intricate showers of rhythm that
suggest they have been listening to the music of India. The guitarists chug-chug
rock style, drone folk-style, twang country-style, and wail rhythm-and-blues style,
but they too are increasingly falling into sitar-like improvisations of great
color and intensity. Most of them own several Ravi Shankar records. The best
guitarists are capable of extended jazzish statements. Instead of wrapping it
all up in a three-minute, hit-recordable package, a San Francisco rock group is
likely to devote fifteen or twenty minutes to a single number.
The influences which touch the San Francisco sound cover a big slice of the
musical spectrum. The Beatles are a stronger influence than ever now that they
have ventured into raga-rock and electronic sound processing, and even those San Francisco musicians
not directly indebted to the Beatles musically are grateful to them for using
their charisma to create a public taste for experimental rock and roll. Another
immediate strand of influence is pure folk-rock – the lyrical, harmonic kind
popularized by the Byrds, the Lovin’ Spoonful, and the We Five (itself a San
Francisco group), and the growling, shouting kind popularized by Bob Dylan.
Certain kinds of modern classical music have also been influential. Some of the
San Francisco
build their sound to a level of pure white noise, an aspect of the music that
John Cage would appreciate. But the most important influence on the San Francisco sound is the
blues. At the Fillmore and the Avalon, blues bands more often than not appear
on the same bill with San Francisco
rock bands. Chicago’s Paul Butterfield Blues
Band and New York’s Blues Project have
appeared frequently in San Francisco, and their
blend of folk-rock and blues has become part of the San Francisco sound. An older generation of
blues singers has exerted considerable influence as well. In the past month
alone, three very great blues singers – Muddy Waters, Big Mama Willie Mae
Thornton, and Lightnin’ Hopkins
– have played dance-concerts at the Fillmore Auditorium.
All these strains have been synthesized into a unique sound
that is San Francisco’s
own. Ralph Gleason argues that “it is the first generation of white American
musicians who aren’t trying to be Negroes. They admire Negro musicians like
Otis Redding but aren’t interested in imitating them. They are producing
something that cannot be dismissed as merely an imitation of any other kind of
music.”
The most popular of the San Francisco groups is the Jefferson
Airplane.
The Jefferson Airplane is further in a purer folk-rock
direction than the other San Francisco
groups. Its group vocalizings use folk-style harmony and have a lyricism
generally lacking in the San Francisco
sound.
The Airplane was organized two years ago by its lead singer,
Marty Balin, twenty-three, and the group’s main asset is still Balin’s strong,
clear alto voice. Balin slurs his sibilants, a fortunate speech defect which
only adds to the liquid quality of his voice. Broad-shouldered, heavy-browed,
and handsome, Balin writes most of the Airplane’s material. Like most other San Francisco groups, the
Airplane performs largely original material. When it performs other songs (such
as “Midnight Hour” and “Tobacco Road,” which have become standards among San
Francisco rock groups), it uses original arrangements.
The Airplane’s five other members include one girl, a slim,
lovely brunette named Grace Slick, whose huge, deep blue eyes flash under her
bangs. Her throaty contralto and strong vibrato add depth to the group’s sound.
When the Jefferson Airplane plays at the Fillmore
Auditorium, their set begins with a recording of a jet plane taking off. The
sound builds from a low rumble; at the moment it reaches the screaming pinnacle
of acceleration, the Airplane launches into its first number. Somehow they
manage to maintain the excitement, creating a rolling, building head of steam
with each song. They have a joyous sound even though nearly everything they
play is in a minor mode. On a song like “My Best Friend,” Marty Balin and Grace
Slick stare deep into each other’s eyes as they sing, and the electricity
crackles.
“The Airplane has style,” says Ralph Gleason, “and all the
people who really make it have got that.” And, indeed, it seems more than
likely that the Airplane will “really make it.” RCA Victor signed them up with
a fat twenty-five-thousand-dollar advance. Last week they were in Los Angeles recording
their second album. And on January 1 they will appear on television’s Bell
Telephone Hour in a segment taped at the Fillmore.
In preparation for the success its members fully expect, the
Jefferson Airplane is polishing itself up and working hard on new material. But
they retain a San Franciscan disdain for crass commercialism. “Sure, we’re
tightening up,” says Skip Spence, twenty-four, the Airplane’s drummer. “But
we’re still not showtime U.S.A.
Like we don’t all dress the same. One guy’ll wear a suit and another guy’ll
look like he just slept under a train.”
They have played in Chicago, Los Angeles, and points in between, but they prefer San Francisco. “It’s
quiet here,” says Jack Casady, twenty-two, the bass guitar player, a dandyish
dresser whose nose and pouty mouth are the only parts of his face visible under
a Beatles-esque mop of fine hair. “There’s no big hassle. The audiences are
more demanding here, and you get everybody, from high society to beatniks.”
“The thing about San
Francisco,” adds Marty Balin, “is that everything that
happens in the scene is run by the people on the scene. No outside sharpies, no
big businessmen.”
“The competition here is all friendly,” puts in rhythm
guitarist and singer Paul Kantner, twenty-four, who looks like a shaggy blond
S.J. Perelman without the mustache. “None of that sneaky cutthroat stuff you
get in commercial scenes.”
“----,” concludes Jorma Ludwik Kaukonen, twenty-five, who is
tall and angular and has shoulder-length, wavy brown hair. He is quiet but is
an exceptionally skillful lead guitarist.
The Jefferson Airplane has invaded territory previously
untouched by rock and roll. They played the usually purist Monterey Jazz
Festival this summer. More recently (October 19) they performed at the San
Francisco Opera Guild’s “Fol de Rol,” an annual fund-raiser which is also one
of the city’s most important society events of the season. The Airplane
appeared on the same program with members of the San Francisco Opera, who sang
pompous versions of 'Bess, You Is My Woman Now,' 'Wouldn't It Be Loverly,' and
other favorites. Not all the gowned ladies and tuxedoed gentlemen who filled
the Civic Auditorium appreciated the intrusion of hard-driving folk-rock - some
even hissed - but the Junior Leaguers and their husbands were enthusiastic.
Every member of the Jefferson Airplane wears his or her hair
long, but compared to the Grateful Dead, the Airplane looks like the
freckle-faced kid next door.
The Dead, nearly as popular as the Plane, play a purer
version of the San Francisco
sound. Their music is harder, reedier, eerier, and hoarser. They are five very
strange-looking young men. Jerry Garcia – nicknamed “Captain Trips” – is husky
and leather-jacketed. He has frizzy hair, like Nancy of Nancy and Sluggo, a
homely face, and a gentle smile. Bob Weir, nineteen, the rhythm guitarist, is
ethereal and graceful, with light brown locks that wave gently down to his
shoulders. Drummer Bill Sommers, twenty-one, and bass guitarist Phil Lesh,
twenty-six, have Prince Valiant haircuts, black and blond respectively. Ron
McKernan, twenty-one, the organist and lead singer, is commonly known as
“Pig-Pen.” He has a build like W.C. Fields, a Jerry Collona mustache, and very
long, curly hair, which he holds in place Apache-style with a headband. He
always wears a black leather vest over a horizontally striped Polo shirt.
Because of the prominent role that LSD plays in their lives
and art, the Grateful Dead’s music has been called “acid-rock.” It’s an
appropriate tag; during the first months of their existence, the Dead were
bankrolled by Owsley Stanley, who is said to have made more than a million
dollars manufacturing and selling tiny, eggshell-blue capsules of LSD. Indeed,
the name “Grateful Dead” is sometimes interpreted as a reference to the death
of the ego under LSD. The Dead do not object to this interpretation, but Jerry
Garcia says that in fact he found the name one day when he was leafing through
the Oxford Unabridged Dictionary. It refers to a family of medieval ballads.
Since adopting the name the Dead claim to have found a reference to it in the
Egyptian Book of the Dead: “In the land of darkness, the voices of evil are
dispelled by the ship of the sun, which is drawn across the heavens by the
grateful dead.”
The Grateful Dead may not make it big commercially; they
might be too freaky. But Warner Brothers is about to sign them for a record
contract.
“I don’t think the live sound, the live excitement, can be
recorded,” says Jerry Garcia. “Rather than trying to turn the living room or
the car radio into the Fillmore Auditorium, we’ll use the resources of the
recording studio – overtracking things, using other instruments.”
Garcia acknowledges the importance of LSD to the Dead’s
development, but he denies that the group is especially drug-oriented.
“Consciousness-expanding drugs are a part of the way of life of the community
in which we choose to live,” he says. “We don’t construct our music to be drug
music. The way we prefer to play is straight – relaxed and in a good mood. It’s
always better when something’s natural rather than artificial or chemical or
whatever.”
The Jefferson Airplane, the Grateful Dead, the literally
thousands of other groups that are following in their footsteps or branching
out on their own, the lights, the art, the dances: all of it adds up to a sound
and a scene that is unique.
It is a sound and a scene that supports not one, but two,
newspapers: the weekly Mojo Navigator-R&R News and the bi-weekly Deadly
Excess, whose title comes from John Lennon’s pun on the London Daily Express.
It is a sound and a scene that might sweep the country. Or
it might not. San Francisco is a very special kind of city, and things happen
here that could never happen anywhere else. If it doesn’t, perhaps it will be
because, in the words of one Los Angeles record company executive, “these San Francisco
groups refuse to co-operate” – meaning they won’t make the basic changes in
their music that this Angeleno believes are the key to commercial success. But
if the San Francisco sound does become the
American sound, and the San Francisco
scene the American scene, it will be more than just another musical fad. It
will mean that the new way of life that is developing in this city is becoming,
in some sense, the way of life of the young men and women of the land.
(by Hendrik Hertzberg, unpublished file for Newsweek, October 28, 1966)
The complete article was printed in Hertzberg's book of essays, Politics: Observations & Arguments
1966-2004.
* * *
The article was rewritten and condensed to one page for printing in Newsweek. Here is the printed article:
THE NITTY-GRITTY SOUND
Until recently it was an underground sound, the personal and
private expression of the hippies, the new Bohemians who have flocked to
permissive San Francisco.
Today, aboveboard, the San Francisco Sound is the newest adventure in rock ‘n’
roll. It’s a raw, unpolished, freewheeling, vital and compelling sound. And
it’s loud. In Bill Graham’s Fillmore Auditorium a tidal wave of overdriven,
electronic sound penetrates the farthest corner, thunders off the walls and
sets the vast floor vibrating.
With the emergence of the sound, San
Francisco has become the Liverpool
of the West, spawning some 1,500 bands. True hippies, long-haired, unkempt,
psychedelic, the groups have adopted whimsical irreverent names – the Jefferson
Airplane, the Grateful Dead, the Quicksilver Messenger Service, Big Brother and
the Holding Company, the Sopwith “Camel,” the 13th Floor Elevator,
Country Joe & the Fish, and the Loading Zone.
Every weekend in such immense halls as the Fillmore and the
Avalon Ballroom, and college auditoriums like the Pauley Ballroom at Berkeley, the music
assaults the ears; strobe lights, pulsating to the beat, blind the eyes and
sear the nerves. Psychedelic projections slither across the walls in
protoplasmic blobs, restlessly changing shape, color and size. Two or three
thousand young people jam the floor, many in “ecstatic” dress – men with
shoulder-length locks and one earring, cowboy outfits, frock coats, high hats;
women in deliberately tatty evening gowns, rescued from some attic, embellished
by a tiara and sneakers. Arab kaftans are worn by both sexes, who also affect
bead necklaces, the high sign of LSD initiation.
Some of the crowd crouch close to the bandstand where the
sound is most ear-splitting, listening as raptly as if Horowitz were playing
Mozart. The majority (including a sprinkling of young mothers with infants
asleep on their shoulders) dance, dropping their inhibitions like Salome her
veils, inventing odd but apparently satisfying gyrations, the whole scene a
dance-happening. “People are getting more into the nitty-gritty of emotional
and personal life,” says 22-year-old guitarist Peter Albin. “They’re expressing
themselves through physical movement and this creates a real bond between the
musicians and the audience.”
The San Francisco Sound reflects this. It is a cheerful
synthesis of Beatles and blues, folk and country, liberally sprinkled with
Indian Raga. Most popular of the groups is Jefferson Airplane, led by
23-year-old Marty Balin. Balin’s clear, soft voice leads the group toward
melodic folk-style harmonies in such songs as “My Best Friend,” included in
their second RCA album to be released in January. The Grateful Dead, second in
popularity, are blues-oriented, and so far unrecorded. Their hard, hoarse,
screeching sound is pure San Francisco.
“I don’t believe the live sound, the live excitement, can be recorded,” says
24-year-old lead guitarist Jerry Garcia.
One significant characteristic of the San Francisco songs is
the length, often fifteen minutes or longer, ample time to build thunderous climax
upon climax; to change the throbbing tempos, and within a single number to pass
through the land of the blues, the folk, the country and anywhere else
freewheeling invention beckons. Mostly untrained, the top groups boast skilled
and intuitive musicians in whom a depth of genuine feeling and expressive
originality is unmistakable.
The homespun texture, the spontaneity, the freedom of the San Francisco sound
appeal forcefully to the hippie culture. Who are the hippies? NEWSWEEK’s
Hendrik Hertzberg asked a number of them what they did. Typical answers
included, “I just try to love everybody, man,” or “I take a lot of acid” [LSD],
or “I don’t know, I try to keep open to all the beautiful things.” Tall, thin
Chet Helms, the bearded 24-year-old patriarch who runs the Avalon Ballroom,
says that San Francisco has become the focus of “a ‘now consciousness,’
instrumented by the growing of psychedelic chemicals as a tool for expression.”
Meanwhile more and more record companies are tempting the
San Francisco groups, more and more clubs across the country are opening wide
their doors. But so far the San Francisco Sound prefers the warmth of its
hippies. “When we play out of town,” says 23-year-old John Cipollina, lead
guitarist of the Quicksilver Messenger Service, “the out-of-towners have to be
turned on to our message of freedom. The people out here are really open and
the musicians are open. There’s a big love thing going around, you know.”
(by Hendrik Hertzberg, from Newsweek, December 19, 1966)
The Newsweek article has a couple pictures: a picture of the Airplane playing at the Fillmore, captioned:
“A big love thing going around.” And a picture of the Dead glowering on the street, captioned: “A
mixed bag.”
I find this article fascinating for a couple of reasons. Aside from being a good, extensive look at the SF music scene in October '66, I think it's also one of the first times the Dead were mentioned in the national media. (More east-coast publications were turning their attention to SF music around this time - for instance, Gene Sculatti's "San Francisco Bay Rock" in Crawdaddy, November '66, and Richard Goldstein's "San Francisco Bray" in the Village Voice in early '67, both written after visits to San Francisco)
ReplyDeleteI'm also struck by the discrepancy between the full original essay, and what was actually printed. Almost nothing was used - it was completely rewritten, with only a couple sentences in both pieces - and more quotes from musicians were used in the Newsweek article, so it was not just a simple edit. Presumably Hertzberg had a lot of research material to draw from.
It may have been common practice for writers at Newsweek to write long pieces that would then be cut down & redone for the magazine. For instance, Michael Lydon was also a music journalist at Newsweek at that time. His book Flashbacks includes an extensive Lennon-McCartney interview from 1966 ("Newsweek's music editors used the following piece as a research file, but it's never before been published as is") and a 17-page review of the 1967 Monterey festival ("I sent it to New York, where the editors boiled it down to ten paragraphs").
Another thing that struck me is that the full essay culminates with the Grateful Dead, as kind of the "purest" endpoint of the San Francisco sound - and Jerry Garcia, labeled a "culture hero," is quoted throughout with various observations. While this seems natural from our perspective, for someone writing in October '66 to do this is remarkable.
The supposed Egyptian Book of the Dead line is quoted (in a slightly different version), I think for the first time - someone "discovered" this quote sometime in '66, and it would be used in ads for the band in winter '67. It was not an actual quote from the Egyptian Book of the Dead, but apparently the band believed it was. At any rate, Hertzberg was interested enough in the band's name to mention various interpretations - the original "medieval ballad" angle, the "death of the ego under LSD," and the Egyptian religious connotation.
Hertzberg suspects they're "too freaky" to make it commercially, but he knows they're signing a record contract with Warners. Garcia points out that they don't want to just record their live act, saying that can't be done, but want to "use the resources of the recording studio – overtracking things, using other instruments.” When they recorded their first album they'd be too rushed to really do this and basically played the tracks live, one reason that album disappointed them. (And obviously they kept quiet about the summer '66 Scorpio Records single to this writer!)
Garcia also "denies that the group is especially drug-oriented" and says that the Dead are not strictly "drug music - the way we prefer to play is straight." Whether true or not, this points to an early divide between the band's perception of itself, and the public image of the Dead as an LSD band or "acid-rock" band. Garcia's position would always be that the Dead's music was not for the freak crowd only, but should include 'straights' as well - similar to Bill Graham's line here: "We don't want you to freak out. We want you to melt."
In the published article, the Dead are boiled down to two sentences - they're blues-oriented, unrecorded, and perhaps can't be recorded - the implication being that they're too far-out with their "hard, hoarse, screeching sound" and their 15-minute songs, compared to the more popular Airplane's "melodic folk-style harmonies."
ReplyDeleteThough the Dead are prominent, the Airplane get the most praise - in the full essay the Airplane's live show gets an ecstatic paragraph, but the Dead's show is not described at all (although the essay starts out with a typical Fillmore scene during a Dead show). This is somewhat disappointing from my point of view, but I think Hertzberg obliquely describes the Dead when summarizing the 'San Francisco sound,' noting the influence of Indian & modern classical music, among other strands - "The best guitarists are capable of extended jazzish statements...are increasingly falling into sitar-like improvisations of great color and intensity...build their sound to a level of pure white noise, [which] John Cage would appreciate...likely to devote fifteen or twenty minutes to a single number...ample time to build thunderous climax upon climax; to change the throbbing tempos, and within a single number to pass through the land of the blues, the folk, the country and anywhere else freewheeling invention beckons."
Hertzberg seems to have stayed in San Francisco at least a couple weeks to research the article. He describes the Love Pageant Rally on October 6, and the Airplane's show on October 19; the Dead played a couple weekends at the Fillmore that month. Grace Slick joined the Airplane mid-month, and they were about to start recording Surrealistic Pillow.
Hendrik Hertzberg here. Thanks for digging this up.
ReplyDeleteAbout a year ago, I wrote about my interlude as a reporter in the San Francisco bureau of Newsweek:
http://www.newyorker.com/news/hendrik-hertzberg/newsweeks-glory-days-mine-too
The article Newsweek actually published was written by Hubert Saal, the magazine’s then music editor and critic. He drew from my "file" as well as from various news clips and phone calls. He was a talented fellow, but he didn’t have much of a feel for this particular story.
Also, as I explain in the blog item, the picture of Jefferson Airplane that I took and Newsweek published was not a picture of Jefferson Airplane.
Hey, that was fast. Thanks for the informative link.
DeleteI hadn't known you were going to shows in SF for months in '66. It's also useful to read about the process by which a long correspondent's "file" would be turned into a story. Even though the wording was different, the Newsweek story followed your original writing closely enough (and adding extra quotes) that I'd wondered if you'd done the cutting & rewriting yourself - now I know it was an editor.
Funny about the picture, I didn't spot that. But hey, you got named in the story too!
I noticed that skip spence is quoted in the full october,1966 piece and mentioned as the airplane's drummer, but that is incorrect. He was fired around may of '66 and replaced by spencer dryden. It is almost certain that spence's quote had to come from an interview done earlier in the year.
ReplyDelete